<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>We Are Aware &#187; media</title>
	<link>http://www.we-are-aware.sg</link>
	<description>A community site in Singapore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.0" -->

	<item>
		<title>How ST covered the story</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I HAD been reluctant to write this piece defending The Straits Times' coverage of the Aware saga. Some of my colleagues had wanted the paper to put out its side of the story in the face of criticisms over how we covered the saga. But I wasn't keen to make the paper the focus of this long-running debate, for I've always felt that newspapers shouldn't be active players in the stories they cover. Our job is to report accurately and fairly what is happening and to make sense of it for our readers so they can draw their own conclusions. ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.we-are-aware.sg/2009/06/01/how-st-covered-the-story/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sin Boon Ann: AWARE &amp; Failure of the Media</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In parliament, the MP for Tampines GRC spoke to the defence of "The New Guard" arguing that their actions were a legitimate manoeuvre. He also accused the media of a failure to report all sides of the story.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.we-are-aware.sg/2009/05/28/sin-boon-ann-aware-failure-of-the-media/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

